Exploring Deborah Tannen’s “Sex, Lies, and Conversation

Mis communions Deborah Tannens Sex, Lies, and Conversation is a brief look at how work force and wo hands communicate with one a nonher and the cross-culture differences amid their individual styles and ineluctably for conversation. Women often say that men do not listen or do not want to communication. Tannen gives reasons why women angle to believe that men atomic number 18 not audience, and shows that just beca engross men collapse a unlike approach to communicating does not mean they are not perceive to what women are saying.She uses several different examples to back up her statements including early childishness differences in communication between girls and boys, the body language men use and how women slope to figure it, and how women tend to receive information while communicating. workforce and women have very different expectations when it comes to communicating with one another. The way women converse varies greatly from the way men tend to converse. Even you ng girls and boys have very different ways of communicating with one another.Young children tend to list up with other children of the same gender, and the boys and girls tend to have completely different sociable interactions with one another. Tannen states that these systematic differences in childhood socialization make ripple between women and men like cross-cultural communication, heir to all the drawing card and pitfalls of that enticing but difficult enterprise (51). We see in women and in young girls, talk creates intimacy and intimacy creates friendships, but men and boys tend to bond more on doing things with one another rather than talking to each other.Even the stance men take when talking varies from a adult females. Women tend to think men are not listening to them establish on the position men take when carrying on a conversation. roughly women, when talking, tend to look one another in the eye. Men on the other hand tend to look around the room, occasionally spotting a glance at the person they are conversing with. Women also tend to stay on one topic for longer periods of time than men. Women are also active listeners and tend to make more listener-noise, such(prenominal) as mhm, uhuh, and yeah, to show Im with you (53). Men tend to be more silent listeners. All these misinterpretations of communication tend to drive a file between men and women. A big reason communication fails between men and women is a lack of understanding the different ways in which men and women communicate. When women expect the person they are communicating with to face them directly, make listener-noises, and stay on topic, it is easy to see how they view mens unfocused attention, silent listening, and scattered topics as men not listening to what they are saying. These differences begin to clarify why women and men have such different expectations about communication in marriage (54). Women use talk as a form a gossip, where men are unremarkably more anta gonistic in conversation. Women tend to be offended by the oppositional form of communication, and men find the random babblings of a woman to be useless and unimportant. Understanding these differences as cross-cultural rather than individual force out help forge solutions to these problems without placing blame on the individual. Communication between men and women is certainly cross-cultural.Some examples of this theory are early childhood differences in communication between girls and boys, the body language men use and how women tend to interpret it, and how women tend to receive information while communicating. The differences between men and women should not be judged but rather accepted and respected. If they can do that, progression in our communication will surely follow. Men and women will everlastingly communicate differently, but at least if they understand the differences they can die hard forward. ? Work Cited Tannen, Deborah. Sex, Lies, and Conversation. The Nor ton Mix. Ed. Sieg, Judy. New York W. W. Norton, 2012. Print.