Presidential vs. Parliamentary Political Systems Essay -- Political Sc

Presidential vs. parliamentary Political Systems There are two master(prenominal) types of semipolitical formations, oneness organism a prexyial transcription and the separate being a parliamentary system. Both of them have their own benefits as well as their own dis proceedss. No political system arouse be completed or can always have stability, but shown in tale on that point are successful countries that use either one. Also at that place are countries that have failed with one of the two systems. Firstly there is the chairpersonial system. There are many characteristics to a presidential system. The first main articulation of a presidential system is how the executive is elected. The executive is a president who is elected to a fixed term. Also a president is not only head of state, but is head of politics. The president is the mend executive of the government. Even though there is a cabinet in a presidential system it does not have the power it does in a parlia mentary system. The cabinet is chosen by the president rather of chosen by the parliament. A president has to follow a genius rather than following history. The president actually has a large part in the governments decisions. A big advantage to political scientists of the presidential system is that there is a separation of powers. The legislative weapon system being separate from the executive branch lets one another apply checks and balances on each other. This assures that no one branch will put one over over or attempt to take over the government. Another advantage of a presidential system is that the population elects the chief executive and the legislative branch. By winning a popular vote shows that close of a country is backing the executive which does not seem to cause revolution. The president can not dissolve an assembly as one can in a parliamentary system. Also in a presidential system there is the judicial branch, which is the court system. The judicial branch i s meaning(a) because it helps uphold the constitution. One of the last advantages of a presidential system is that there is more stability because a president is elected to a fixed term, where as in a parliamentary system a eyeshade minister can be ousted at any time. A presidential system is not perfect, but it has its high and low points. The other type of political system being analyzed is a parliamentary system. A parliamentary system has its executive branch in ... ... be elected by the majority of the population of the country. Also there being a written constitution in a presidential system makes it easier to prefer because this explains the law precisely and accurately. In a presidential system there is a judicial branch which makes it fair to be move for crimes, which is a plus too. I may be bias because I live in a country that has a presidential system, which is the unite States and it is the or so successful nation, but I feel that even if lived in another country I would envy our style of government and would indirect request to live here. A presidential government is by the far the approximately successful and fairest way to run a country.I feel that France is most comparable to the political system I prefer. It is semi-presidential, which is more effective than a parliamentary system. Their election process is similar to a presidential system, which shows a popular vote in the population wins. The parliament can arraign the premier also, which is good because it does not let one part of government make any drastic changes without the parliament agreeing. I feel that France is most like my preferred type of political system because of these reasons.