The Possible Outcomes of Globalization

Human beings maintain always been dirty, corrupt, deceitful and horrible. tho humans also admit few redeeming factors that account for our original state of relative peace, our ability to innovate, the ability for great kindness and to cathexis for other living functions. All because each individual person is as different as the last with their own unique experiences and morals and standards that furl to our own incredibly different personalities and attitudes. Yet there be those who int annul that striping us of the things that asks us s exit be a great improvement on society horizontal when the evidence points elsewhere. on that point is a very clear disagreement in our society well-nigh what we should do and what the benefits of globe(prenominal)ization be. Black and White sides to a very gray-headed issue. Usu on the wholey battalion on the adjust will score that globalization is a good thing, giving you this Claims increase in diversity and creativity, c e verywhere becomes easier and cheaper, goods become more than than accessible and cheaper, and that everyone will be materially richer. Countries atomic number 18 becoming more a standardized in the sense of offering rough more comm totally diverse choices. -Tyler Cowen(supporter of Globalization) The other side to this argon pack that argon decidedly on the left and they will say things identical Homogenization of cultivation, loss of creativity, total loss of some cultures, hatful will become easier to control through advertisements, society becomes about on the job(p) and belongings afloat and non living an actual aliveness, creates violence within people try to protect their culture. Fast food ecomes a fueling up ritual that if it social or family values is what you about consequently its a disaster. -Benjamin Barber (advocate against globalization). Although I say most conservatives and most liberals is because some conservatives dont see it for what is and buy i nto what the businessman would say and that all cultures would get a bit of every other culture and atomic number 18 fearful of the blending of culture and are against it. Some liberals think that obstetrical delivery bullion to the third humankind countries, and many another(prenominal) more reasons.This is not to say that the political spectrum doesnt play a role but quite an a major one, as most people on the right see it for what it is and support it because globalization creates wealth for the multinational corporations and destroys the native peoples culture and making them more focused on work and it becomes a win-win situation. Liberals are fearful of the corporation as once the people are on the bandwagon its very easy to keep them on it and the power of the people of those nations falls to the businesses.Another reason for concern on the part of all citizens disregarding of political ideologies is the outsourcing of jobs, which we are already seeing the effects of a s unemployment unemployment rate moving to 9. 5% in the U. S. , the highest level since 1983. The same thing happened rough the globe the unemployment rate surged to record high values. -London Forex Broadsheet. My opinion is that there are large winnings and some very hard losses to be had.On one side it boosts the local economy and overall wealth of the accepted poorer country, and poverty by any measure is a horrible thing to live in. Unfortunately it destroys the culture that has survived for possibly thousands of days Just over 38% of global cultures are in danger of extinction or are already extinct-UNESCO and we lose some of the history that makes the world the way it is, also globalization buttocks destroy the local surround and cause serious physical injury and sickness. About one half(a) of the forests that covered the Earth are gone.Each year, another 16 million hectares disappear. -globalchange. umich. edu And the only reason they live in poverty is not because the yre useless and faineant but because of the current global economic system we use. So overall I believe that the losses outweigh the possible gains. The driving forces underside globalization is the corporations they first lobby the government to build an airport formulation it will bring more tourists and money. afterwards they move in and imbed up factories (depending on the ethics or pressure put on them by the public) or sweatshops.So the increased tourism brings foreign ideas and technology ilk democracy, freedom, wealth, internet, computers, TVs, etc. After they make some money in a dangerous mine or a low remunerative factory they buy a TV/Computer and they see what we confound and they want it, they see our big houses and big cars and they will save up and buy one. when they do that they adopt our north ameri cornerstone culture and they expose going to church because they can get more money working weekends, they dress like we do and act like we do.They want to be li ke us so they tell their parents that their culture is dumb and research how this new culture brought us out of poverty, and how we dont extradite to pick through garbage anymore. Once people think like this and act like this it causes other people to join them, thinking surface he has a car a house and nice clothes, why cant I keep up that? So as more people drop their culture and uniqueness the faster it speeds up. The possibilities of an outcome of this en pottye shift towards a North American lifestyle are endless, but what is almost certain is the fact that 99. % of the time this will end badly and not just for the humans that live here but the entire planet. So I will propose 3 scenarios that mainly cover the possible outcomes at this point in time. Scenario 1) As more and more people get cars, computers, and use more electricity the carbonic acid gas emissions increase exponentially and we get to a tipping point in the line and a cascade/domino effect happens. Methane from the bottom of the ocean is released into the air travel and the Earth heats up flush more.Then the Amazon burns heating it even more, etc. etc. and the world fries and after 100000 years the Earth is plunged into an ice age. By the way almost everyone died. Scenario 2) As more and more jobs are outsourced to cheaper labour the North American way of life collapses because theres no jobs and with no money you cant buy anything. Then the whole global economic market crashes and burns. military man is plunged into WWIII for the remaining resources, nuclear bombs are launched, whole countries become uninhabitable.Billions die. Scenario 3) In a global effort we switch over to renewable resources and solve the global energy crisis and with that we are able to stabilize the economy and regain peace. It is so possible to help and provide electricity to developing countries. There are many proposed resultant roles to the crisis we are dealing with but just as with many other proble ms many of the solutions prove to be ineffective or even more harmful. So what will it take to have a solution that will save us?Unfortunately its too late to have a gradual change that would allow for people to adapt advantageously to the new lifestyle that i am about to propose. We will have to do this quickly and without hesitation because the longer we wait the more atrocious this will be. In scenario 3 of the last paragraph is what we will have to do as currently many of the wars being fought around the world are about or were started by the need of the black gold, oil, and n battle array to restore peace we need to switch over to a more renewable way of life especially here in North America. Not only will this reduce the incentive to eat each other over something that will become increasingly noncurrent but it will also help calm the people who are angry at the way we live here because of our wastefulness. Also regulation by the government will have to be passed in order to make it harder for corporations to treat people poorly and pay them less, also make them create jobs in their home (eg US, Canada, UK, etc. ) countries.Increased tourism from more money and cheaper bills will help reinforce the local cultures as people ordinarily travel to see the culture. Advertisements will have to be localized and not forcing the American way of life down peoples throats. I believe that this will, if not completely solve this issue, help out greatly. Unfortunately people cant see what is happening around them and then when they finally consider what has happened its too late, and that is the problem, why we cant solve this crisis and why we cant solve many other difficult issues that exist.The fact is that until something blasting happens no one will do anything about it, history shows this and as the saying goes History always repeats itself. Globalization will continue to be a problem for a very long time and when the mass population sees what has happene d it will be too late. all we can do is support groups in foreign countries that try to sustain the culture and voice communication of their ancestors.